What Is Crisis Communications?
Crisis communications is a specialised discipline within public relations focused on protecting and defending an organization facing a significant threat to its reputation or operations. Unlike routine corporate communications, crisis communications operates under intense pressure, tight timeframes, and high stakes.
Timothy Coombs, a leading scholar in the field, defines crisis communications as “the collection, processing, and dissemination of information required to address a crisis situation.” It encompasses how organizations prepare for, respond to, and recover from events that threaten their stability or public image.
What distinguishes crisis communications from everyday PR is its strategic focus on maintaining trust and operational continuity during extraordinary circumstances. It requires coordination across departments—including leadership, legal, HR, operations, and communications—to deliver consistent, accurate, and timely information to all stakeholders.
“Crisis communications is not just about what you say, but when you say it, how you say it, and the actions that accompany your words.”
Why Crisis Communications Matter
The stakes in crisis situations extend far beyond temporary negative headlines. Here’s why effective crisis communications is indispensable for modern organizations:
Reputation Protection
A company’s reputation—built over years or decades—can be severely damaged in just hours during a poorly handled crisis. Research shows that organizations with strong crisis communications recover market value faster following negative events.
Stakeholder Trust
Employees, customers, investors, and regulators all need reliable information during a crisis. Transparent, consistent communication maintains trust when it’s most vulnerable. Silence or dishonesty creates information vacuums that others will fill—often inaccurately.
Legal Protection
How an organization communicates during a crisis can significantly impact potential legal liability. Strategic crisis communications, developed in coordination with legal counsel, helps mitigate risk while maintaining public confidence.
Financial Impact
The financial consequences of poorly managed crises are well-documented. A 2023 study by Deloitte found that companies with inadequate crisis response experienced an average 22% drop in share price following major incidents, with many taking more than a year to recover pre-crisis values.
Beyond immediate market reactions, crises can trigger customer boycotts, regulatory fines, litigation costs, and operational disruptions—all of which impact the bottom line. Effective crisis communications helps minimize these financial impacts by demonstrating control, responsibility, and forward action.
Operational Continuity
During crises that affect operations—such as natural disasters, supply chain disruptions, or cyber attacks—clear communication ensures that employees understand priorities, customers know what to expect, and partners can adjust accordingly. This coordination is essential for maintaining business continuity.
Assess Your Crisis Readiness
Is your organization prepared for a communications crisis? Download our free Crisis Communications Readiness Checklist to identify gaps in your preparation.
Crisis Communications in Action: Success and Failure
Examining real-world examples provides valuable insights into effective crisis communications strategies—and costly mistakes to avoid.
Success Stories
Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol Recall (1982)
When seven people died after taking cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules, Johnson & Johnson immediately recalled 31 million bottles at a cost of $100 million. The company prioritized consumer safety above all else, communicated transparently, and took responsibility despite not being at fault for the tampering.
Key lessons: Swift action, public safety prioritization, and transparent communication helped Johnson & Johnson recover market share and strengthen consumer trust. Their response remains the gold standard for crisis management.
Starbucks’ Racial Bias Response (2018)
After two Black men were wrongfully arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks, CEO Kevin Johnson quickly acknowledged the incident as “reprehensible,” personally apologized, met with the men, and closed 8,000+ stores for racial bias training. The company’s response demonstrated accountability and commitment to meaningful change.
Key lessons: Personal leadership involvement, acknowledging the problem without deflection, and taking concrete action helped Starbucks address the crisis effectively.
Cautionary Tales
BP’s Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (2010)
BP’s response to the largest marine oil spill in history was plagued by communication missteps. Then-CEO Tony Hayward’s comment that he “wanted his life back” while 11 workers had died and coastal communities were devastated exemplified the company’s tone-deaf approach. BP initially downplayed the severity of the spill and shifted blame to contractors.
Key lessons: BP’s communication failures compounded the environmental disaster with a reputational one, demonstrating how poor crisis communications can exacerbate damage and erode trust.
United Airlines’ Passenger Removal (2017)
When passenger Dr. David Dao was forcibly removed from an overbooked United flight, video of the incident went viral. United’s initial response referred to “re-accommodating” passengers and failed to acknowledge the severity of the situation or express appropriate concern for Dr. Dao’s injuries.
Key lessons: United’s delayed and inadequate response demonstrated how failing to acknowledge stakeholder concerns and show genuine empathy can transform an operational incident into a major reputational crisis.
Key Principles of Effective Crisis Communications
Successful crisis communications follows several fundamental principles that apply across industries and crisis types:
Speed and Preparedness
In the digital age, organizations often have minutes, not hours, to respond. The first 24 hours typically define the narrative. Having pre-approved messaging templates, designated spokespersons, and clear activation protocols enables rapid response when a crisis hits.
Transparency and Honesty
Stakeholders expect and deserve the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable. Transparency builds credibility, while attempts to hide information inevitably backfire when the truth emerges. This doesn’t mean sharing unverified information—it means being honest about what you know, what you don’t know, and what you’re doing to find out.
Empathy and Responsibility
Effective crisis communications acknowledges impact on affected parties and demonstrates genuine concern. Taking appropriate responsibility—without unnecessarily admitting liability—shows organizational values in action.
Consistency Across Channels
All communications channels—from media statements to social media posts to employee communications—should deliver consistent messages. Contradictions between channels create confusion and undermine credibility.
| Crisis Communications Principle | Implementation Strategy | Common Pitfall |
| Speed | Develop pre-approved message templates for likely scenarios | Waiting for perfect information before responding |
| Transparency | Share verified information promptly, acknowledge unknowns | Withholding information that will eventually become public |
| Empathy | Acknowledge impact on affected parties in human terms | Using corporate language that distances from human impact |
| Consistency | Coordinate all communications through central crisis team | Different departments sending contradictory messages |
| Leadership Visibility | Involve senior leaders in appropriate communications | Hiding leadership during difficult moments |
Crisis Communications in the Digital Age
The fundamentals of crisis communications remain constant, but the landscape has transformed dramatically with social media and the 24/7 news cycle:
Accelerated Timelines
Social media has compressed crisis response windows from days to minutes. Information—and misinformation—spreads instantly, requiring organizations to monitor continuously and respond rapidly.
Democratized Information
Anyone with a smartphone can now broadcast information about your organization to the world. This means crises often emerge from unexpected sources and gain traction before traditional monitoring systems detect them.
Expectation of Immediate Response
Stakeholders now expect near-immediate acknowledgment when issues arise. The “golden hour” of crisis response has shrunk dramatically, making prepared statements and monitoring systems essential.
Global Visibility
Local incidents can quickly become global stories. Organizations must consider international and cross-cultural implications of their crisis communications, even for seemingly localized events.
Stay Ahead of Communication Crises
Subscribe to our monthly Crisis Communications Insights newsletter for the latest trends, case studies, and best practices.
Developing Your Crisis Communications Plan
An effective crisis communications plan is developed before it’s needed and regularly updated to reflect organizational changes and emerging risks.
Essential Components
- Crisis Team Structure: Define roles, responsibilities, and contact information for all crisis team members, including backups.
- Risk Assessment: Identify and prioritise potential crisis scenarios specific to your organization and industry.
- Activation Protocols: Establish clear criteria for when to activate the crisis plan and escalation procedures.
- Stakeholder Analysis: Map all stakeholders who may need communication during different crisis types.
- Message Templates: Develop pre-approved messaging frameworks for likely scenarios that can be quickly customised.
- Channel Strategy: Determine which communication channels will be used for different audiences and crisis types.
- Approval Process: Create streamlined approval workflows that balance accuracy with speed.
- Monitoring System: Implement tools and processes to detect emerging issues across traditional and social media.
- Training Program: Regularly train crisis team members and conduct simulation exercises.
Implementation Best Practices
Having a plan is only the first step. Effective implementation requires:
- Regular Testing: Conduct crisis simulations at least annually to identify gaps and build team coordination.
- Continuous Updates: Review and revise the plan quarterly to reflect organizational changes and new potential risks.
- Cross-Functional Integration: Ensure alignment between communications, legal, operations, and executive leadership.
- Accessible Resources: Make crisis materials available in multiple formats and locations for easy access during emergencies.
- Post-Crisis Analysis: After any activation, conduct thorough reviews to identify improvements for future response.
Case Study: Turning Crisis into Opportunity
Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 (2018)
When Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 experienced a catastrophic engine failure resulting in one passenger fatality in 2018, the company faced a potentially devastating crisis. Their response demonstrated how effective crisis communications can preserve and even strengthen stakeholder relationships.
The Response
Southwest immediately:
- Acknowledged the incident on social media within 30 minutes
- Deployed CEO Gary Kelly to deliver a video statement expressing sincere condolences
- Provided regular updates across all channels
- Coordinated with regulatory authorities transparently
- Offered comprehensive support to affected passengers and families
- Suspended marketing campaigns out of respect
The Results
Southwest’s response was widely praised for its humanity, transparency, and appropriate tone. The airline maintained customer trust through a tragic situation and demonstrated its values in action. Their stock price recovered within weeks, and the incident did not significantly impact long-term booking patterns.
This case illustrates how even in the most challenging circumstances, effective crisis communications can protect organizational reputation and stakeholder relationships.
The Future of Crisis Communications
As technology and social expectations evolve, crisis communications continues to adapt. Several emerging trends will shape the discipline in coming years:
AI and Predictive Analytics
Artificial intelligence is increasingly being deployed to monitor for potential crises before they fully emerge. Predictive analytics can identify unusual patterns in social media sentiment or media coverage that may signal developing issues.
Integrated Crisis Technology
Specialized crisis management platforms now enable organizations to coordinate response across departments, track incident development, and manage communications from a single dashboard—even with distributed teams.
Authenticity Expectations
Stakeholders increasingly expect organizations to communicate with genuine human voices during crises, rather than corporate-speak. This shift requires more authentic, empathetic messaging from leaders.
Proactive Transparency
Leading organisations are adopting “radical transparency” approaches—proactively disclosing issues before they become crises. This strategy, sometimes called “stealing thunder,” can significantly reduce reputational damage.
Conclusion: Crisis Communications as Strategic Advantage
Crisis communications is no longer just an emergency response function—it’s a strategic capability that builds organizational resilience. Organisations that invest in crisis preparedness demonstrate foresight and responsibility to stakeholders while positioning themselves to weather inevitable challenges.
The most effective crisis communications programs share common characteristics: they’re proactive rather than reactive, integrated across the organisation rather than siloed in communications departments, and regularly tested and improved rather than developed and forgotten.
In today’s complex, interconnected world, crises are inevitable. But their impact on your organisation isn’t predetermined. With thoughtful preparation and strategic implementation, crisis communications can transform potential disasters into opportunities to demonstrate your values, strengthen stakeholder relationships, and distinguish your organization from less-prepared competitors.
Prepare Before Crisis Strikes
Download our comprehensive Crisis Communications Plan Template to build or strengthen your organisation’s crisis readiness.